# GLM-4.6 vs Qwen Plus

> GLM-4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Plus costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-4.6's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-6-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen Plus in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GLM-4.6 leads 36.4 to 22.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 47.4% for GLM-4.6 and 63.3% for Qwen Plus.
- Qwen Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $2.20 for GLM-4.6.
- Qwen Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 205K.
- GLM-4.6 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.6 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.9 | 36.7 |
| Rank | 132 | 204 |
| Context | 205K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.60 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $2.20 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-4.6: 39.9 (#137)
- Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1449 | 1328 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 55.4% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1339 | — |
| SciCode | 38.4% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 340.82 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GLM-4.6: 32.1 (#60)
- Qwen Plus: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 24.5% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 72.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.6: 23.1 (#168)
- Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 47.4% | 63.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1440 | 1317 |
| CritPt | 1.1% | — |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |

## Math

- GLM-4.6: 36.4 (#115)
- Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1431 | 1326 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 3.8% | 1.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 2.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.6: 39.6 (#118)
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1432 | 1328 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.5% | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.6: 53.6 (#62)
- Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1426 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1500 | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1394 | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | 1418 | 1323 |
| LMArena French | 1459 | — |
| LMArena German | 1447 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1401 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1436 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.6: 74.5 (#93)
- Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1410 | 1303 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.6: 43.4 (#91)
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1423 | 1325 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.6: 61.3 (#86)
- Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1440 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1411 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1427 | 1336 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1411 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.6 better than Qwen Plus?

GLM-4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Plus costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-4.6's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GLM-4.6 or Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; GLM-4.6 lists at $0.60 and $2.20.

### Is GLM-4.6 or Qwen Plus better for coding?

GLM-4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen Plus does, with 1M tokens against 205K.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6 and Qwen Plus share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6 has 29 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.