# GLM-4.6 vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview

> GLM-4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 32.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-6-vs-nova-2-0-pro-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6 scores higher in 2 categories and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where GLM-4.6 leads 32.1 to 21.9.
- GLM-4.6 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.6 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Amazon |
| Noometry Index | 40.9 | 32.8 |
| Rank | 132 | 241 |
| Context | 205K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-4.6: 39.9 (#137)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.2 (#130)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 38.4% | 42.7% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 55.4% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1339 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1449 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 340.82 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GLM-4.6: 32.1 (#60)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#127)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 24.5% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 72.4% | — |
| GDP.pdf | — | 2% |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.6: 23.1 (#168)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 1.1% | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 47.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1440 | — |

## Math

- GLM-4.6: 36.4 (#115)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1431 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 3.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 2.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.6: 39.6 (#118)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1432 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.6: 53.6 (#62)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1500 | — |
| LMArena French | 1459 | — |
| LMArena German | 1447 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1394 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1401 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1418 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1436 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.6: 74.5 (#93)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1410 | — |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.6: 43.4 (#91)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1423 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.6: 61.3 (#86)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1440 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1411 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1427 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.6 better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?

GLM-4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 32.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GLM-4.6 or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (39.9 vs 40.2); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6 and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6 has 29 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.