# GLM-4.6 vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

> GLM-4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 35.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-6-vs-nemotron-4-340b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6 scores higher in 8 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.6 leads 61.3 to 42.9.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.6 | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 40.9 | 35.3 |
| Rank | 132 | 218 |
| Context | 205K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-4.6: 39.9 (#137)
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.6 (#223)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1449 | 1209 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 55.4% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1339 | — |
| SciCode | 38.4% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 340.82 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GLM-4.6: 32.1 (#60)
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 24.5% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 72.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.6: 23.1 (#168)
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 22.4 (#180)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1440 | 1202 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 47.4% | — |
| CritPt | 1.1% | — |

## Math

- GLM-4.6: 36.4 (#115)
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.7 (#193)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1431 | 1216 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 3.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 2.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.6: 39.6 (#118)
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.4 (#212)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1432 | 1171 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.5% | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.6: 53.6 (#62)
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 38.0 (#228)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1426 | 1206 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1500 | 1214 |
| LMArena French | 1459 | 1196 |
| LMArena German | 1447 | 1192 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1394 | 1128 |
| LMArena Korean | 1401 | 1148 |
| LMArena Russian | 1418 | 1219 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1436 | 1195 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.6: 74.5 (#93)
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.3 (#227)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1410 | 1203 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.6: 43.4 (#91)
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#216)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1423 | 1225 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.6: 61.3 (#86)
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.9 (#229)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1440 | 1225 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1411 | 1203 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1427 | 1214 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1411 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.6 better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?

GLM-4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 35.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GLM-4.6 or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?

GLM-4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6 and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6 has 29 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.