# GLM-4.5V vs Qwen3.7 Flash

> GLM-4.5V and Qwen3.7 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.2 vs 39.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-5v-vs-qwen3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 36.8.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $1.80 for GLM-4.5V.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 64K.
- GLM-4.5V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.2 | 39.5 |
| Rank | 158 | 152 |
| Context | 64K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.60 | $0.03 |
| Output $/M | $1.80 | $0.13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-4.5V: 38.9 (#152)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | — |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.5V: 26.5 (#118)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1335 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.62 |

## Math

- GLM-4.5V: 34.7 (#157)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1353 | — |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.5V: 36.8 (#155)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | — |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.5V: 33.6 (#86)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.5V: 44.9 (#172)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1304 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1338 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1299 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1335 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.5V: 69.4 (#170)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | — |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#166)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1305 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.5V: 52.7 (#162)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1333 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.5V better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

GLM-4.5V and Qwen3.7 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.2 vs 39.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5V or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; GLM-4.5V lists at $0.60 and $1.80.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 64K.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.