# GLM-4.5V vs Qwen3.6 Plus

> Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.3 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-5v-vs-qwen3-6-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5V scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Plus in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 56.1 to 36.8.
- GLM-4.5V is cheaper at $0.60 / $1.80 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Qwen3.6 Plus.
- Qwen3.6 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 64K.
- GLM-4.5V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.2 | 47.3 |
| Rank | 158 | 54 |
| Context | 64K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.60 | $0.50 |
| Output $/M | $1.80 | $3 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-4.5V: 38.9 (#152)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.6 (#125)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | 1467 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 57.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1461 |
| SciCode | — | 40.7% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 670.15 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GLM-4.5V: —
- Qwen3.6 Plus: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,115 |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.5V: 26.5 (#118)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 28.5 (#89)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1335 | 1449 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 60.3% |
| CritPt | — | 2.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 17% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 59.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 12% |
| DTBench | — | 81.9% |
| LMCA | — | 33.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.67 |

## Math

- GLM-4.5V: 34.7 (#157)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 50.6 (#44)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1353 | 1450 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 38.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 26.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 8.3% |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.5V: 36.8 (#155)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#40)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | 1456 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 88.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 44.1% |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.5V: 33.6 (#86)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.5V: 44.9 (#172)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.5 (#66)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1304 | 1424 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1338 | 1478 |
| LMArena Russian | 1299 | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1335 | 1432 |
| LMArena French | — | 1454 |
| LMArena German | — | 1451 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1381 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.5V: 69.4 (#170)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.2 (#70)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | 1425 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#166)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.1 (#48)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1305 | 1440 |
| CL-bench | — | 20.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.5V: 52.7 (#162)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.4 (#78)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | 1405 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1333 | 1438 |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.5V better than Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.3 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5V or Qwen3.6 Plus?

GLM-4.5V is cheaper. It lists at $0.60 per million input tokens and $1.80 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 Plus lists at $0.50 and $3.

### Is GLM-4.5V or Qwen3.6 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.6 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 64K.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Qwen3.6 Plus share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Plus has 37.