# GLM-4.5V vs Qwen3.5 Plus

> Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-5v-vs-qwen3-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 47.9 to 34.7.
- Both cost about the same: $0.60 input and $1.80 output per million tokens.
- Qwen3.5 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 64K.
- GLM-4.5V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.2 | 42.3 |
| Rank | 158 | 103 |
| Context | 64K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.60 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $1.80 | $2.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-4.5V: 38.9 (#152)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 621.92 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GLM-4.5V: —
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.5V: 26.5 (#118)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.0 (#67)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1335 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 80.5% |
| LMCA | — | 36.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.79 |

## Math

- GLM-4.5V: 34.7 (#157)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 47.9 (#55)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1353 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.5V: 36.8 (#155)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#78)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 25.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | — |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.5V: 33.6 (#86)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.5V: 44.9 (#172)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1304 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1338 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1299 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1335 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.5V: 69.4 (#170)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | — |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#166)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 42.9 (#109)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1305 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.5V: 52.7 (#162)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1333 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.5V better than Qwen3.5 Plus?

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5V or Qwen3.5 Plus?

GLM-4.5V is cheaper. It lists at $0.60 per million input tokens and $1.80 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 Plus lists at $0.40 and $2.40.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.5 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 64K.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Qwen3.5 Plus share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.