# GLM-4.5V vs Qwen Turbo

> GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 10× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-4.5V's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-5v-vs-qwen-turbo
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where GLM-4.5V leads 37.4 to 15.3.
- Qwen Turbo is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $1.80 for GLM-4.5V.
- Qwen Turbo accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 64K.
- GLM-4.5V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.5V | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.8 | 27.1 |
| Rank | 158 | 335 |
| Context | 64K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.60 | $0.05 |
| Output $/M | $1.80 | $0.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155)
- Qwen Turbo: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | — |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119)
- Qwen Turbo: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1334 | — |

## Math

- GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159)
- Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1354 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156)
- Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | — |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92)
- Qwen Turbo: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177)
- Qwen Turbo: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1303 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1337 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1336 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175)
- Qwen Turbo: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | — |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171)
- Qwen Turbo: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1304 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170)
- Qwen Turbo: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1332 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.5V better than Qwen Turbo?

GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 10× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-4.5V's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5V or Qwen Turbo?

Qwen Turbo is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; GLM-4.5V lists at $0.60 and $1.80.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen Turbo does, with 1M tokens against 64K.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Qwen Turbo share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.