# GLM-4.5V vs Phi-4 Mini

> GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 Mini costs 6.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-4.5V's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-5v-vs-phi-4-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-4.5V leads 36.8 to 24.8.
- Phi-4 Mini is cheaper at $0.075 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $1.80 for GLM-4.5V.
- Phi-4 Mini accepts more context: 128K tokens versus 64K.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.5V | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 39.2 | 30.4 |
| Rank | 158 | 280 |
| Context | 64K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.60 | $0.075 |
| Output $/M | $1.80 | $0.30 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-4.5V: 38.9 (#152)
- Phi-4 Mini: 27.6 (#312)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 10.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | — |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.5V: 26.5 (#118)
- Phi-4 Mini: 21.7 (#190)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1335 | — |

## Math

- GLM-4.5V: 34.7 (#157)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1353 | — |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.5V: 36.8 (#155)
- Phi-4 Mini: 24.8 (#261)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | — |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.5V: 33.6 (#86)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.5V: 44.9 (#172)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1304 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1338 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1299 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1335 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.5V: 69.4 (#170)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | — |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#166)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1305 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.5V: 52.7 (#162)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1333 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.5V better than Phi-4 Mini?

GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 Mini costs 6.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-4.5V's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5V or Phi-4 Mini?

Phi-4 Mini is cheaper. It lists at $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; GLM-4.5V lists at $0.60 and $1.80.

### Is GLM-4.5V or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?

GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 27.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Phi-4 Mini does, with 128K tokens against 64K.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Phi-4 Mini share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.