# GLM-4.5V vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

> GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-5v-vs-phi-3-mini-128k-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5V scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.5V leads 52.5 to 27.1.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.5V | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 39.8 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 158 | 305 |
| Context | 64K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.80 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | 1039 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 29.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.6% |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1334 | 1028 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |

## Math

- GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1354 | 1089 |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | 984 |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1303 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1337 | 1016 |
| LMArena Russian | 1298 | 1004 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1336 | 1059 |
| LMArena French | — | 1039 |
| LMArena German | — | 1006 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 899 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 856 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | 1023 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1304 | 996 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | 1050 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1332 | 989 |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.5V better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GLM-4.5V or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.