# GLM-4.5V vs Phi-3.5-mini

> GLM-4.5V has enough public results to be ranked (#158); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-5v-vs-phi-3-5-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where GLM-4.5V leads 39.5 to 34.6.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.5V | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 39.8 | 36.9 |
| Rank | 158 | — |
| Context | 64K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.80 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155)
- Phi-3.5-mini: 34.6 (#232)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 38.5% |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119)
- Phi-3.5-mini: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1334 | — |
| PIQA | — | 81% |

## Math

- GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159)
- Phi-3.5-mini: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1354 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.2% |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156)
- Phi-3.5-mini: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 78% |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92)
- Phi-3.5-mini: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177)
- Phi-3.5-mini: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1303 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1337 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1336 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175)
- Phi-3.5-mini: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | — |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171)
- Phi-3.5-mini: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1304 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170)
- Phi-3.5-mini: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1332 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.5V better than Phi-3.5-mini?

GLM-4.5V has enough public results to be ranked (#158); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is GLM-4.5V or Phi-3.5-mini better for coding?

GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Phi-3.5-mini share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-mini has 5.