# GLM-4.5V vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

> GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-5v-vs-olmo-2-0325-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5V scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-4.5V leads 36.8 to 19.2.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.5V | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 39.2 | 32.2 |
| Rank | 158 | 248 |
| Context | 64K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.80 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-4.5V: 38.9 (#152)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | 1210 |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.5V: 26.5 (#118)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1335 | 1208 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |

## Math

- GLM-4.5V: 34.7 (#157)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1353 | 1208 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.5V: 36.8 (#155)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | — |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.5V: 33.6 (#86)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.5V: 44.9 (#172)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1304 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1338 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1299 | 1187 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1335 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.5V: 69.4 (#170)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | 1186 |
| IFEval | — | 78% |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#166)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1305 | 1194 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.5V: 52.7 (#162)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1333 | 1221 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.5V better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GLM-4.5V or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.