# GLM-4.5V vs Mistral

> GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-5v-vs-mistral
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5V scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-4.5V leads 37.5 to 16.6.
- GLM-4.5V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.5V | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 39.8 | 29.9 |
| Rank | 158 | 303 |
| Context | 64K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.80 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155)
- Mistral: 33.8 (#250)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | 1162 |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119)
- Mistral: 22.2 (#200)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1334 | 1149 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |

## Math

- GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159)
- Mistral: 22.3 (#278)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1354 | 1180 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 7.2% |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156)
- Mistral: 16.6 (#288)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | 1125 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 27.7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 30.3% |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92)
- Mistral: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177)
- Mistral: 32.8 (#254)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1303 | 1129 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1337 | 1109 |
| LMArena Russian | 1298 | 1168 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1336 | 1143 |
| LMArena French | — | 1180 |
| LMArena German | — | 1155 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1013 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1032 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175)
- Mistral: 52.6 (#288)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | 1152 |
| IFEval | — | 56.8% |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171)
- Mistral: 35.0 (#245)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1304 | 1153 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170)
- Mistral: 37.0 (#260)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | 1165 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | 1158 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1332 | 1147 |
| WildBench | — | 66% |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.5V better than Mistral?

GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GLM-4.5V or Mistral better for coding?

GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Mistral share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Mistral has 22.