# GLM-4.5V vs Mistral Medium 3.1

> GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-5v-vs-mistral-medium-3-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GLM-4.5V leads 27.4 to 10.6.
- Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper at $0.40 / $2 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $1.80 for GLM-4.5V.
- Mistral Medium 3.1 accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 64K.
- GLM-4.5V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.5V | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 39.8 | 31.9 |
| Rank | 158 | 266 |
| Context | 64K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.60 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $1.80 | $2 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | — |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.6 (#341)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 6.5% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 20.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1334 | — |

## Math

- GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1354 | — |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | — |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1303 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1337 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1336 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | — |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1304 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.5 (#145)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1476 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1332 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.5V better than Mistral Medium 3.1?

GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5V or Mistral Medium 3.1?

Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $2 per million output tokens; GLM-4.5V lists at $0.60 and $1.80.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Medium 3.1 does, with 131K tokens against 64K.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.