# GLM-4.5V vs Llama 3.2 90B

> GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-5v-vs-llama-3-2-90b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GLM-4.5V scores higher in 4 categories and Llama 3.2 90B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GLM-4.5V leads 34.7 to 10.4.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.5V | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 39.2 | 27.1 |
| Rank | 158 | 326 |
| Context | 64K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.80 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-4.5V: 38.9 (#152)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GLM-4.5V: —
- Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.5V: 26.5 (#118)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1335 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.5 |

## Math

- GLM-4.5V: 34.7 (#157)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1353 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.4% |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.5V: 36.8 (#155)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41% |
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | — |
| MMLU | — | 80.3% |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.5V: 33.6 (#86)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.5V: 44.9 (#172)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1304 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1338 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1299 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1335 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.5V: 69.4 (#170)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | — |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#166)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1305 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.5V: 52.7 (#162)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1333 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.5V better than Llama 3.2 90B?

GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Llama 3.2 90B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.