# GLM-4.5V vs Inkling

> Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index. GLM-4.5V costs 2.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Inkling's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-5v-vs-inkling
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5V scores higher in 2 categories and Inkling in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Inkling leads 55.1 to 37.5.
- GLM-4.5V is cheaper at $0.60 / $1.80 per million input/output tokens, against $1.87 / $4.68 for Inkling.
- Inkling accepts more context: 66K tokens versus 64K.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.5V | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Thinking Machines Lab |
| Noometry Index | 39.8 | 44.1 |
| Rank | 158 | 80 |
| Context | 64K | 66K |
| Input $/M | $0.60 | $1.87 |
| Output $/M | $1.80 | $4.68 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155)
- Inkling: 34.5 (#234)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | 1464 |
| FrontierCode | — | 14% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1413 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 4.1% |
| SciCode | — | 47% |
| WeirdML | — | 32.3% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 946 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GLM-4.5V: —
- Inkling: 29.6 (#85)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 33.8% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 25% |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119)
- Inkling: 40.4 (#56)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1334 | 1451 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 36.5% |
| SimpleBench | — | 50% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 79.5% |
| CritPt | — | 5.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| DTBench | — | 87.5% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 148.54 |

## Math

- GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159)
- Inkling: 31.3 (#225)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1354 | 1479 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 33.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 4.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 88.9% |
| ProofBench | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156)
- Inkling: 55.1 (#49)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | 1465 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 88.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 40.3% |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92)
- Inkling: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177)
- Inkling: 54.0 (#52)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1303 | 1434 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1337 | 1490 |
| LMArena Russian | 1298 | 1429 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1336 | 1448 |
| LMArena French | — | 1458 |
| LMArena German | — | 1446 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1429 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1404 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175)
- Inkling: 75.1 (#71)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | 1426 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171)
- Inkling: 43.8 (#86)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1304 | 1434 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170)
- Inkling: 65.2 (#51)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | 1441 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | 1387 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1332 | 1436 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1611 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1226 |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.5V better than Inkling?

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index. GLM-4.5V costs 2.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Inkling's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5V or Inkling?

GLM-4.5V is cheaper. It lists at $0.60 per million input tokens and $1.80 per million output tokens; Inkling lists at $1.87 and $4.68.

### Is GLM-4.5V or Inkling better for coding?

GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 34.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Inkling does, with 66K tokens against 64K.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Inkling share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Inkling has 41.