# GLM-4.5V vs Hunyuan T1 20250711

> Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-5v-vs-hunyuan-t1
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5V scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.5 to 52.5.
- GLM-4.5V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.5V | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 39.8 | 42.5 |
| Rank | 158 | 114 |
| Context | 64K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.80 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | 1390 |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1334 | 1399 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |

## Math

- GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1354 | 1414 |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | 1395 |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1303 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1337 | 1425 |
| LMArena Russian | 1298 | 1385 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1406 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1336 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | 1374 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1304 | 1384 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1332 | 1393 |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.5V better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GLM-4.5V or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.