# GLM-4.5V vs Grok 4.7

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index. GLM-4.5V costs 3.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-5v-vs-grok-4-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5V scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.7 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.7 leads 62.8 to 37.5.
- GLM-4.5V is cheaper at $0.60 / $1.80 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Grok 4.7.
- Grok 4.7 accepts more context: 500K tokens versus 64K.
- GLM-4.5V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.5V | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 39.8 | 53.1 |
| Rank | 158 | 37 |
| Context | 64K | 500K |
| Input $/M | $0.60 | $2 |
| Output $/M | $1.80 | $6 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155)
- Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | 1427 |
| FrontierCode | — | 47.6% |
| CursorBench | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1639 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 29.5% |
| SciCode | — | 57.8% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GLM-4.5V: —
- Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 54.6% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 22.8% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 10,537 |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119)
- Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1334 | 1413 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 76.8% |
| CritPt | — | 18% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 38% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 29% |
| DTBench | — | 96% |
| LMCA | — | 49.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 153.53 |

## Math

- GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159)
- Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1354 | 1407 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 53% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 17.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 98.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 34% |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156)
- Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | 1422 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 92.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 56% |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92)
- Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | 1228 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 32.5% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20.8% |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177)
- Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1303 | 1389 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1337 | 1455 |
| LMArena Russian | 1298 | 1397 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1336 | 1400 |
| LMArena French | — | 1455 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175)
- Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | 1404 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171)
- Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1304 | 1413 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170)
- Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | 1399 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | 1391 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1332 | 1393 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2007 |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.5V better than Grok 4.7?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index. GLM-4.5V costs 3.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5V or Grok 4.7?

GLM-4.5V is cheaper. It lists at $0.60 per million input tokens and $1.80 per million output tokens; Grok 4.7 lists at $2 and $6.

### Is GLM-4.5V or Grok 4.7 better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.7 does, with 500K tokens against 64K.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Grok 4.7 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 39.