# GLM-4.5V vs Grok 4.3

> Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index. GLM-4.5V costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-5v-vs-grok-4-3
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5V scores higher in 1 category and Grok 4.3 in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.3 leads 52.5 to 37.5.
- GLM-4.5V is cheaper at $0.60 / $1.80 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $2.50 for Grok 4.3.
- Grok 4.3 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 64K.
- GLM-4.5V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.5V | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 39.8 | 43.8 |
| Rank | 158 | 86 |
| Context | 64K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.60 | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | $1.80 | $2.50 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155)
- Grok 4.3: 41.6 (#121)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | 1415 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1357 |
| SciCode | — | 47.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 49.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 944.17 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GLM-4.5V: —
- Grok 4.3: 27.7 (#99)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | — | 8% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1165 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 35.26 |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119)
- Grok 4.3: 35.9 (#68)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1334 | 1396 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 55.2% |
| CritPt | — | 8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 25% |
| DTBench | — | 90.7% |
| LMCA | — | 38.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 149.16 |
| ForecastBench | — | 60.3 |

## Math

- GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159)
- Grok 4.3: 46.0 (#74)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1354 | 1388 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 42.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 14.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| ProofBench | — | 11% |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156)
- Grok 4.3: 52.5 (#62)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | 1385 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 88.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 33.2% |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92)
- Grok 4.3: 31.6 (#104)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | 1229 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 0% |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177)
- Grok 4.3: 50.5 (#120)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1303 | 1385 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1337 | 1422 |
| LMArena Russian | 1298 | 1399 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1336 | 1398 |
| LMArena French | — | 1412 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1379 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1356 |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175)
- Grok 4.3: 72.1 (#140)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | 1366 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171)
- Grok 4.3: 42.5 (#123)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1304 | 1393 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170)
- Grok 4.3: 58.5 (#118)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | 1380 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1332 | 1406 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1075 |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.5V better than Grok 4.3?

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index. GLM-4.5V costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5V or Grok 4.3?

GLM-4.5V is cheaper. It lists at $0.60 per million input tokens and $1.80 per million output tokens; Grok 4.3 lists at $1.25 and $2.50.

### Is GLM-4.5V or Grok 4.3 better for coding?

Grok 4.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.6 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.3 does, with 1M tokens against 64K.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Grok 4.3 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.3 has 40.