# GLM-4.5 vs Qwen1.5-14B

> GLM-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-5-vs-qwen1-5-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-14B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.5 leads 57.5 to 33.6.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.5 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.0 | 32.7 |
| Rank | 122 | 253 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-4.5: 41.4 (#125)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 33.1 (#263)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1434 | 1138 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 54.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 40.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 344.82 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.52 | — |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.5: 28.6 (#100)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 21.4 (#223)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1429 | 1113 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 57.9% | — |

## Math

- GLM-4.5: 39.0 (#116)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 32.4 (#215)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1427 | 1125 |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.5: 35.9 (#179)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 29.8 (#232)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1433 | 1094 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 11.3% | — |
| MMLU | — | 68.6% |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.5: 52.8 (#77)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 30.7 (#262)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1417 | 1095 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1147 |
| LMArena French | 1418 | 1116 |
| LMArena German | 1407 | 1043 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1415 | 1019 |
| LMArena Russian | 1414 | 1046 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1454 | 1085 |
| LMArena Korean | 1380 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.5: 74.1 (#104)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 56.8 (#271)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1404 | 1102 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.5: 38.2 (#201)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#257)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1412 | 1113 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 58.3% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.5: 57.5 (#127)
- Qwen1.5-14B: 33.6 (#276)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1430 | 1128 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1395 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1415 | 1110 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.4% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1343 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.5 better than Qwen1.5-14B?

GLM-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GLM-4.5 or Qwen1.5-14B better for coding?

GLM-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 33.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5 and Qwen1.5-14B share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5 has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-14B has 17.