# GLM-4.5 vs Llama 3.2 90B

> GLM-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-5-vs-llama-3-2-90b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where GLM-4.5 leads 36.3 to 10.4.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.5 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 41.4 | 27.1 |
| Rank | 125 | 326 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-4.5: 41.1 (#121)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 54.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 40.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1434 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 344.82 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.52 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GLM-4.5: —
- Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.5: 27.7 (#99)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 57.9% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1430 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.5 |

## Math

- GLM-4.5: 36.3 (#119)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1427 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.4% |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.5: 35.5 (#172)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 11.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1433 | — |
| MMLU | — | 80.3% |

## Multimodal

- GLM-4.5: —
- Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.5: 53.0 (#74)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1417 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | — |
| LMArena French | 1423 | — |
| LMArena German | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1382 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1414 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1454 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.5: 74.3 (#100)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1405 | — |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.5: 38.2 (#196)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 58.3% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1413 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.5: 57.7 (#121)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1430 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1395 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.4% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1343 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1415 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.5 better than Llama 3.2 90B?

GLM-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5 and Llama 3.2 90B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5 has 27 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.