# GLM-4.5 vs Hunyuan T1 20250711

> GLM-4.5 and Hunyuan T1 20250711 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.0 vs 42.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-5-vs-hunyuan-t1
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5 scores higher in 5 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 42.2 to 38.2.
- GLM-4.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.5 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 42.0 | 42.5 |
| Rank | 122 | 114 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GLM-4.5: 41.4 (#125)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1434 | 1390 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 54.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 40.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 344.82 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.52 | — |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.5: 28.6 (#100)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1429 | 1399 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 57.9% | — |

## Math

- GLM-4.5: 39.0 (#116)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1427 | 1414 |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.5: 35.9 (#179)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1433 | 1395 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 11.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.5: 52.8 (#77)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1417 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1425 |
| LMArena Korean | 1380 | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | 1414 | 1385 |
| LMArena French | 1418 | — |
| LMArena German | 1407 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1415 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1454 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.5: 74.1 (#104)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1404 | 1374 |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.5: 38.2 (#201)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1412 | 1384 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 58.3% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.5: 57.5 (#127)
- Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1430 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1395 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1415 | 1393 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.4% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1343 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.5 better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?

GLM-4.5 and Hunyuan T1 20250711 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.0 vs 42.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is GLM-4.5 or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (41.4 vs 40.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5 and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5 has 27 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.