# GLM-4.5-Air vs Wizardlm 13b

> GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-5-air-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5-Air scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.5-Air leads 56.1 to 30.7.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.5-Air | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 38.7 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 169 | 272 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.20 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.10 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-4.5-Air: 34.5 (#225)
- Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5-Air | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1397 | 1035 |
| GSO | 2.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.5-Air: 23.3 (#166)
- Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5-Air | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1379 | 1018 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 43% | — |
| ForecastBench | 59.2 | — |

## Math

- GLM-4.5-Air: 33.8 (#166)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5-Air | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1017 |
| Omni-MATH | 39.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.5-Air: 34.6 (#184)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5-Air | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 76.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 59.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1370 | — |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.5-Air: 49.4 (#130)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5-Air | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1366 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1427 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1399 | — |
| LMArena German | 1376 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1348 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1373 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1385 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.5-Air: 69.8 (#165)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5-Air | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1353 | 1049 |
| IFEval | 81.2% | — |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.5-Air: 41.6 (#130)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5-Air | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1367 | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.5-Air: 56.1 (#134)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5-Air | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1384 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1343 | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1371 | 1047 |
| WildBench | 78.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.5-Air better than Wizardlm 13b?

GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GLM-4.5-Air or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

GLM-4.5-Air scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.5 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5-Air and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5-Air has 27 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.