# GLM-4.5-Air vs Mistral Nemo

> GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 2.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-4.5-Air's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/glm-4-5-air-vs-mistral-nemo
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.5-Air leads 56.1 to 28.6.
- Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.20 / $1.10 for GLM-4.5-Air.
- GLM-4.5-Air accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | GLM-4.5-Air | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 38.7 | 25.9 |
| Rank | 169 | 332 |
| Context | 131K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.20 | $0.15 |
| Output $/M | $1.10 | $0.15 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- GLM-4.5-Air: 34.5 (#225)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5-Air | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GSO | 2.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1397 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GLM-4.5-Air: —
- Mistral Nemo: 23.3 (#118)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5-Air | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
| BALROG | — | 17.6% |

## Reasoning

- GLM-4.5-Air: 23.3 (#166)
- Mistral Nemo: 19.9 (#230)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5-Air | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 43% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1379 | — |
| DTBench | — | 48.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.63 |
| ForecastBench | 59.2 | — |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |

## Math

- GLM-4.5-Air: 33.8 (#166)
- Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#263)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5-Air | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 39.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1396 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10.8% |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |

## Knowledge

- GLM-4.5-Air: 34.6 (#184)
- Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#293)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5-Air | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 29.9% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 76.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 59.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1370 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |

## Multilingual

- GLM-4.5-Air: 49.4 (#130)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5-Air | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1366 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1427 | — |
| LMArena French | 1399 | — |
| LMArena German | 1376 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1348 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1373 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1385 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GLM-4.5-Air: 69.8 (#165)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5-Air | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 81.2% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1353 | — |

## Long Context

- GLM-4.5-Air: 41.6 (#130)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5-Air | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1367 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GLM-4.5-Air: 56.1 (#134)
- Mistral Nemo: 28.6 (#291)

| Benchmark | GLM-4.5-Air | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1384 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1343 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 881 |
| WildBench | 78.9% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1371 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GLM-4.5-Air better than Mistral Nemo?

GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 2.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-4.5-Air's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5-Air or Mistral Nemo?

Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; GLM-4.5-Air lists at $0.20 and $1.10.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GLM-4.5-Air does, with 131K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5-Air and Mistral Nemo share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5-Air has 27 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.