# Gemma 7B vs Trinity Large Thinking

> Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-7b-vs-trinity-large-thinking
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 1 category and Trinity Large Thinking in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Trinity Large Thinking leads 54.0 to 27.2.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 7B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 295 | 180 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 7B: 29.9 (#290)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 33.8 (#238)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | 1381 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 7B: 19.0 (#247)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 16.3 (#298)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 1350 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.74 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 7B: 28.7 (#225)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 34.9 (#149)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | 1366 |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 7B: 26.8 (#248)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 40.3 (#107)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1002 | 1359 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 7B: 25.3 (#282)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 46.4 (#155)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | 1372 |
| LMArena French | 1024 | 1374 |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | 1338 |
| LMArena German | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1312 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1304 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1356 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 7B: 51.7 (#290)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 70.7 (#157)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 1334 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#277)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 41.2 (#139)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | 1355 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 7B: 27.2 (#297)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 54.0 (#152)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1321 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | 1342 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 7B better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 7B or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

Trinity Large Thinking scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.8 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Trinity Large Thinking share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.