# Gemma 7B vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412

> Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-7b-vs-step-2-16k-exp-202412
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 52.5 to 27.2.
- Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 7B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | 38.6 |
| Rank | 295 | 173 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 7B: 29.9 (#290)
- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 37.9 (#170)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | 1316 |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 7B: 19.0 (#247)
- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 24.8 (#140)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 1299 |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.74 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 7B: 28.7 (#225)
- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 33.6 (#171)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | 1305 |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 7B: 26.8 (#248)
- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 34.6 (#187)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1002 | 1279 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 7B: 25.3 (#282)
- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.9 (#176)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 1290 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | 1331 |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | 1324 |
| LMArena French | 1024 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 7B: 51.7 (#290)
- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 68.1 (#187)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 1287 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#277)
- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#165)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | 1307 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 7B: 27.2 (#297)
- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.5 (#168)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 1321 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1328 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | 1292 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 7B better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 7B or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.