# Gemma 7B vs Solar Pro4

> Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-7b-vs-solar-pro4
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Solar Pro4 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Solar Pro4 leads 56.5 to 27.1.
- Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 7B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 42.1 |
| Rank | 299 | 121 |
| Context | — | 524K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294)
- Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | 1437 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249)
- Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 1399 |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228)
- Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | 1416 |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252)
- Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | 1427 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287)
- Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | 1415 |
| LMArena French | 1025 | 1397 |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | 1360 |
| LMArena German | — | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1401 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295)
- Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 1377 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282)
- Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | 1381 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302)
- Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | 1385 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 7B better than Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 7B or Solar Pro4 better for coding?

Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Solar Pro4 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.