# Gemma 7B vs Qwen3.8 Max

> Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.0 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-7b-vs-qwen3-8-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 73.1 to 28.7.
- Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 7B | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | 56.0 |
| Rank | 295 | 21 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 7B: 29.9 (#290)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 52.3 (#30)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | 1499 |
| DeepSWE | — | 57.5% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1671 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 15.8% |
| SciCode | — | 52.9% |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 7B: —
- Qwen3.8 Max: 42.6 (#17)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 55.1% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 23.2% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 7B: 19.0 (#247)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 53.4 (#26)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 1493 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.74 | 156.69 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 88.3% |
| CritPt | — | 20% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 40% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 38% |
| DTBench | — | 92% |
| LMCA | — | 46.2% |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 7B: 28.7 (#225)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 73.1 (#15)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | 1498 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 100% |
| ProofBench | — | 58% |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 7B: 26.8 (#248)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#25)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1002 | 1504 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 92.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 47.3% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 7B: —
- Qwen3.8 Max: 36.9 (#70)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1314 |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 7B: 25.3 (#282)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 56.6 (#18)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 1468 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | 1537 |
| LMArena French | 1024 | 1502 |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | 1478 |
| LMArena German | — | 1489 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1466 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1467 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1495 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 7B: 51.7 (#290)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 77.7 (#19)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 1478 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#277)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 45.5 (#30)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | 1486 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 7B: 27.2 (#297)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 67.0 (#31)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 1480 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1478 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | 1487 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 7B better than Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.0 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 7B or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.3 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Qwen3.8 Max share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 38.