# Gemma 7B vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

> Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-7b-vs-qwen3-5-max-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 66.0 to 27.1.
- Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 7B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 45.3 |
| Rank | 299 | 71 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | 1487 |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 1483 |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | 1474 |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | 1489 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | 1534 |
| LMArena French | 1025 | 1484 |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | 1471 |
| LMArena German | — | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1495 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1438 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1470 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 1467 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | 1476 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 1470 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | 1478 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 7B better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 7B or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.