# Gemma 7B vs Qwen3.5-Flash

> Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-7b-vs-qwen3-5-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5-Flash leads 57.9 to 27.1.
- Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 7B | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 42.5 |
| Rank | 299 | 112 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 34.2 (#242)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | 1412 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1244 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 221.8 |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 7B: —
- Qwen3.5-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 462.69 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 33.7 (#72)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 1403 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | 143.98 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 20% |
| DTBench | — | 82.9% |
| LMCA | — | 29.1% |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 37.4 (#158)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | 1407 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 6.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 43.2 (#93)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | 1407 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 20.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.5% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 50.5 (#121)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 1385 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | 1446 |
| LMArena French | 1025 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | 1379 |
| LMArena German | — | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1368 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1344 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1400 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 72.6 (#139)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 1374 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 42.4 (#124)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | 1392 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 57.9 (#122)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1343 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | 1393 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 7B better than Qwen3.5-Flash?

Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 7B or Qwen3.5-Flash better for coding?

Qwen3.5-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.2 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Qwen3.5-Flash share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-Flash has 32.