# Gemma 7B vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct

> Gemma 7B and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.0 vs 29.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-7b-vs-qwen2-5-vl-72b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 29.9 |
| Rank | 299 | 302 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $2.80 |
| Output $/M | — | $8.40 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294)
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 7B: —
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.6 (#144)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld | — | 5% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249)
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.7 (#233)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 36% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228)
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | — |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252)
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 7B: —
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 33.5 (#97)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1107 |
| Video-MME | — | 73.5% |
| GeoBench | — | 62% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 33.3% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287)
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | — |
| LMArena French | 1025 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295)
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282)
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302)
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 7B better than Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?

Gemma 7B and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.0 vs 29.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6.