# Gemma 7B vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

> Gemma 7B and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.5 vs 28.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-7b-vs-qwen2-5-7b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads 48.8 to 27.2.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | 28.6 |
| Rank | 295 | 314 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.17 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 7B: 29.9 (#290)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 35.9 (#204)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 46.1% |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 7B: —
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.5 (#117)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 7.8% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 7B: 19.0 (#247)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.3 (#317)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.74 | 118.44 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | — |
| DTBench | — | 47.7% |
| LMCA | — | 6.4% |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 7B: 28.7 (#225)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 11.8 (#300)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.5% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1066 | — |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 7B: 26.8 (#248)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#281)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 66.1% | 72.9% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 35.5% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 53.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 34.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1002 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 7B: 25.3 (#282)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | — |
| LMArena French | 1024 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 7B: 51.7 (#290)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.4 (#226)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 74.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#277)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 7B: 27.2 (#297)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#194)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | — |
| WildBench | — | 73.1% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 7B better than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Gemma 7B and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.5 vs 28.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemma 7B or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.9 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15.