# Gemma 7B vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

> Gemma 7B and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.5 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-7b-vs-qwen2-5-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 7B leads 28.7 to 15.3.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 295 | 291 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 7B: 29.9 (#290)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.1 (#165)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45% |
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.3% |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 7B: 19.0 (#247)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 18.5 (#262)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.74 | 128.52 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 7B: 28.7 (#225)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 15.3 (#289)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1066 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 7B: 26.8 (#248)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#259)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1002 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 7B: 25.3 (#282)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | — |
| LMArena French | 1024 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 7B: 51.7 (#290)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#277)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 7B: 27.2 (#297)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 7B better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Gemma 7B and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.5 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemma 7B or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.