# Gemma 7B vs Qwen-14B

> Qwen-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-7b-vs-qwen-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen-14B in 6 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 7B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 299 | 275 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294)
- Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | 1071 |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249)
- Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 1027 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | 113.03 |
| PIQA | 81.2% | 79.9% |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228)
- Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | 1068 |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | 61.3% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252)
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | 86.2% |
| MMLU | 66.1% | 66.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287)
- Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 1041 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | 1077 |
| LMArena French | 1025 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295)
- Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 1031 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282)
- Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | 1028 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302)
- Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | 1022 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 7B better than Qwen-14B?

Qwen-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 7B or Qwen-14B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (30.5 vs 31.2); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Qwen-14B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.