# Gemma 7B vs phi-3-medium 14B

> Gemma 7B and phi-3-medium 14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.0 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-7b-vs-phi-3-medium-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 2 categories and phi-3-medium 14B in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 7B leads 27.3 to 9.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 7B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 299 | 306 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | 121.23 |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | 79% | 81.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | 91.6% |
| MMLU | 66.1% | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | 73.9% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | — |
| LMArena French | 1025 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 7B better than phi-3-medium 14B?

Gemma 7B and phi-3-medium 14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.0 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemma 7B or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

phi-3-medium 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.8 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and phi-3-medium 14B share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.