# Gemma 7B vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

> Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-7b-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 50.2 to 27.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 39.4 |
| Rank | 299 | 168 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | 1347 |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 1322 |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | 1305 |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | 1308 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | 1304 |
| LMArena French | 1025 | 1328 |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | 1268 |
| LMArena German | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1336 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 1299 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | 1312 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | 1309 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 7B better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 7B or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.