# Gemma 7B vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B

> Gemma 7B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.5 vs 29.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-7b-vs-olmo-2-furious-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads 43.0 to 27.2.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 7B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | 29.2 |
| Rank | 295 | 301 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 7B: 29.9 (#290)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 7B: 19.0 (#247)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.74 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 7B: 28.7 (#225)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1066 | — |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 7B: 26.8 (#248)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1002 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 7B: 25.3 (#282)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | — |
| LMArena French | 1024 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 7B: 51.7 (#290)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#277)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 7B: 27.2 (#297)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 7B better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?

Gemma 7B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.5 vs 29.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemma 7B or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?

Gemma 7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.9 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.