# Gemma 7B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

> MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-7b-vs-mimo-v2-6-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 63.1 to 27.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 7B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 48.5 |
| Rank | 299 | 55 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | 1504 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1637 |
| SciCode | — | 51.3% |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 1482 |
| CritPt | — | 12% |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | 1468 |
| ProofBench | — | 63% |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | 1501 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 7B: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1259 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 1434 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | 1511 |
| LMArena French | 1025 | 1475 |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | 1409 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1456 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 1463 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | 1463 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1400 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | 1451 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 7B better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 7B or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.