# Gemma 7B vs Llama 3-8B

> Gemma 7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.5 to 25.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-7b-vs-llama-3-8b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 22

## Summary

- They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 3 categories and Llama 3-8B in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 7B leads 28.7 to 8.3.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 7B | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | 25.3 |
| Rank | 295 | 338 |
| Context | — | 8K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 7B: 29.9 (#290)
- Llama 3-8B: 30.5 (#285)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | 1152 |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | 56.7% |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | 54.8% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 31.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 36.9% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 7B: 19.0 (#247)
- Llama 3-8B: 13.8 (#321)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 1133 |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | 57.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.74 | 116.33 |
| WinoGrande | 79% | 75.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| DTBench | — | 43.9% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.6 |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 7B: 28.7 (#225)
- Llama 3-8B: 8.3 (#317)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | 1151 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 1.9% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 6.1% |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 7B: 26.8 (#248)
- Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#303)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1002 | 1113 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | 82.8% |
| MMLU | 66.1% | 68.8% |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | 82.6% |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | 67.7% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 26.1% |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 7B: 25.3 (#282)
- Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#256)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 1098 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | 1076 |
| LMArena French | 1024 | 1158 |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | 1109 |
| LMArena German | — | 1104 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 967 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1003 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1172 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 7B: 51.7 (#290)
- Llama 3-8B: 58.7 (#255)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 1127 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#277)
- Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#246)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | 1128 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 7B: 27.2 (#297)
- Llama 3-8B: 37.7 (#251)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Llama 3-8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 1166 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1150 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | 1152 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 7B better than Llama 3-8B?

Gemma 7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.5 to 25.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 7B or Llama 3-8B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (29.9 vs 30.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Llama 3-8B share?

22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-8B has 34.