# Gemma 7B vs Llama 2-13B

> Gemma 7B and Llama 2-13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.0 vs 29.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-7b-vs-llama-2-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 24

## Summary

- They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 2 categories and Llama 2-13B in 6 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemma 7B leads 19.9 to 12.8.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 7B | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 29.6 |
| Rank | 299 | 309 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294)
- Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | 1062 |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249)
- Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 1051 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | 58.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | 106.17 |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | 80.7% |
| PIQA | 81.2% | 80.8% |
| WinoGrande | 79% | 72.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| DTBench | — | 42.2% |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| LAMBADA | — | 76.5% |

## Math

- Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228)
- Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | 1065 |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | 36.9% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252)
- Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | 1030 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | 60.3% |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | 82.4% |
| MMLU | 66.1% | 55.6% |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | 57% |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | 79.6% |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 7B: —
- Llama 2-13B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 55.8% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287)
- Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 1024 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | 1001 |
| LMArena French | 1025 | 1044 |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | 1055 |
| LMArena German | — | 1009 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 894 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 953 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1087 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295)
- Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 1045 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282)
- Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | 1064 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302)
- Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 1084 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1047 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | 1050 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 7B better than Llama 2-13B?

Gemma 7B and Llama 2-13B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.0 vs 29.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemma 7B or Llama 2-13B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (30.5 vs 30.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Llama 2-13B share?

24 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.