# Gemma 7B vs Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo

> Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-7b-vs-kimi-k2-thinking-turbo
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 60.2 to 27.2.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 7B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | 45.4 |
| Rank | 295 | 63 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 7B: 29.9 (#290)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.1 (#166)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | 1454 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1322 |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 7B: 19.0 (#247)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 31.4 (#72)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 1428 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.74 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 7B: 28.7 (#225)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 45.5 (#62)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | 1429 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 83.1% |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 7B: 26.8 (#248)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#64)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1002 | 1439 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.2% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 7B: 25.3 (#282)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.6 (#104)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 1398 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | 1457 |
| LMArena French | 1024 | 1425 |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | 1390 |
| LMArena German | — | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1329 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1407 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 7B: 51.7 (#290)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.2 (#103)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 1403 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#277)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#99)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | 1415 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 7B: 27.2 (#297)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.2 (#99)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 1415 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1373 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | 1414 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 7B better than Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 7B or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better for coding?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21.