# Gemma 7B vs Kimi K2.5 Instant

> Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-7b-vs-kimi-k2-5-instant
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.5 Instant in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 60.8 to 27.2.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 7B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | 42.9 |
| Rank | 295 | 92 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 7B: 29.9 (#290)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.3 (#95)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | 1483 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1404 |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 7B: 19.0 (#247)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 28.5 (#88)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 1443 |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.74 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 7B: 28.7 (#225)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 36.6 (#105)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | 1443 |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 7B: 26.8 (#248)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.5 (#121)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1002 | 1438 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 7B: —
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.5 (#47)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1254 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 7B: 25.3 (#282)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.2 (#89)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 1406 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | 1450 |
| LMArena French | 1024 | 1403 |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | 1404 |
| LMArena German | — | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1378 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1448 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 7B: 51.7 (#290)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.5 (#61)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 1430 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#277)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.8 (#82)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | 1435 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 7B: 27.2 (#297)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.8 (#91)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 1420 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1379 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | 1427 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 7B better than Kimi K2.5 Instant?

Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 7B or Kimi K2.5 Instant better for coding?

Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Kimi K2.5 Instant share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18.