# Gemma 7B vs Hy3

> Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-7b-vs-hy3
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Hy3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hy3 leads 62.2 to 27.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 7B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 44.2 |
| Rank | 299 | 79 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.0825 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.33 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294)
- Hy3: 46.8 (#63)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | 1464 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1508 |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249)
- Hy3: 26.1 (#136)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 1447 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 41.2% |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228)
- Hy3: 40.1 (#93)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | 1475 |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252)
- Hy3: 40.8 (#114)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | 1460 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287)
- Hy3: 53.5 (#65)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 1426 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | 1493 |
| LMArena French | 1025 | 1461 |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | 1432 |
| LMArena German | — | 1439 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1456 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295)
- Hy3: 75.1 (#70)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 1426 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282)
- Hy3: 44.1 (#75)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | 1442 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302)
- Hy3: 62.2 (#81)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1402 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | 1436 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 7B better than Hy3?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 7B or Hy3 better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Hy3 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Hy3 has 19.