# Gemma 7B vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110

> Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-7b-vs-hunyuan-turbo
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads 50.2 to 27.1.
- Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 7B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 39.6 |
| Rank | 299 | 163 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294)
- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | 1319 |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249)
- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 1308 |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228)
- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | 1273 |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252)
- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287)
- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | 1305 |
| LMArena French | 1025 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295)
- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 1278 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282)
- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | 1309 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302)
- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | 1303 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 7B better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 7B or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.