# Gemma 7B vs Grok Build 0.1

> Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.8 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-7b-vs-grok-build-0-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 42.5 to 29.9.
- Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 7B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | 35.8 |
| Rank | 295 | 214 |
| Context | — | 256K |
| Input $/M | — | $1 |
| Output $/M | — | $2 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 7B: 29.9 (#290)
- Grok Build 0.1: 42.5 (#90)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 7B: —
- Grok Build 0.1: 22.5 (#122)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | — | 2.4% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 7B: 19.0 (#247)
- Grok Build 0.1: 31.3 (#73)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.74 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 7B: 28.7 (#225)
- Grok Build 0.1: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | — |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 7B: 26.8 (#248)
- Grok Build 0.1: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1002 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 7B: 25.3 (#282)
- Grok Build 0.1: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | — |
| LMArena French | 1024 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 7B: 51.7 (#290)
- Grok Build 0.1: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#277)
- Grok Build 0.1: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 7B: 27.2 (#297)
- Grok Build 0.1: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 7B better than Grok Build 0.1?

Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.8 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 7B or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?

Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Grok Build 0.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Grok Build 0.1 has 3.