# Gemma 7B vs Grok 4 Fast

> Grok 4 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-7b-vs-grok-4-fast
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4 Fast in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4 Fast leads 60.0 to 27.1.
- Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 7B | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 39.4 |
| Rank | 299 | 167 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294)
- Grok 4 Fast: 32.5 (#271)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | 1429 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1159 |
| WeirdML | — | 42.9% |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 7B: —
- Grok 4 Fast: 29.5 (#86)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 15.7% |
| Cybench | — | 30% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1171 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249)
- Grok 4 Fast: 22.2 (#201)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 1412 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | 144.2 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 5.3% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 66.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 48.5% |
| DTBench | — | 82.7% |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 60.5 |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228)
- Grok 4 Fast: 38.9 (#123)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | 1419 |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252)
- Grok 4 Fast: 32.0 (#214)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | 1411 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 19.7% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287)
- Grok 4 Fast: 51.3 (#111)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 1396 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | 1457 |
| LMArena French | 1025 | 1431 |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | 1389 |
| LMArena German | — | 1383 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1352 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1357 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1415 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295)
- Grok 4 Fast: 73.2 (#121)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 1387 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282)
- Grok 4 Fast: 63.2 (#3)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | 1415 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 94.4% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302)
- Grok 4 Fast: 60.0 (#102)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 1407 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1387 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | 1414 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 7B better than Grok 4 Fast?

Grok 4 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 7B or Grok 4 Fast better for coding?

Grok 4 Fast scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.5 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Grok 4 Fast share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4 Fast has 30.