# Gemma 7B vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent

> Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-7b-vs-grok-4-20-multi-agent
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 64.1 to 27.2.
- Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 7B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | 45.5 |
| Rank | 295 | 62 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.50 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 7B: 29.9 (#290)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#91)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | 1458 |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 7B: —
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | — | 1204 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 7B: 19.0 (#247)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#44)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 1448 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 89.6% |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.74 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 7B: 28.7 (#225)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 36.6 (#106)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | 1441 |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 7B: 26.8 (#248)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.7 (#116)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1002 | 1445 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 7B: —
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.8 (#44)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1259 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 7B: 25.3 (#282)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.6 (#40)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 1440 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | 1475 |
| LMArena French | 1024 | 1467 |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | 1457 |
| LMArena German | — | 1456 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1447 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 7B: 51.7 (#290)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 75.0 (#80)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 1420 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#277)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#84)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | 1430 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 7B: 27.2 (#297)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.1 (#57)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 1450 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1435 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | 1451 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 7B better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 7B or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better for coding?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20.