# Gemma 7B vs Grok 4.1 Fast

> Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-7b-vs-grok-4-1-fast
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.1 Fast in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.1 Fast leads 57.2 to 27.1.
- Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 7B | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 41.4 |
| Rank | 299 | 136 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.20 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.50 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 34.1 (#245)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | 1411 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1242 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 394.93 |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 7B: —
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.3 (#39)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 69.6% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 13.1% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1171 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 1,107 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 43.4 (#49)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 1407 |
| SimpleBench | — | 56% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 87.4% |
| DTBench | — | 87.7% |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 61 |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 31.9 (#221)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | 1408 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 60.9% |
| ProofBench | — | 4% |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 33.1 (#207)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | 1399 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 17.8% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 7B: —
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 37.0 (#76)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1201 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 51.0 (#114)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 1391 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | 1441 |
| LMArena French | 1025 | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | 1387 |
| LMArena German | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1349 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1361 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1413 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 72.7 (#133)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 1376 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.4 (#126)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | 1390 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302)
- Grok 4.1 Fast: 57.2 (#131)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 1408 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1394 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | 1389 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1327 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 7B better than Grok 4.1 Fast?

Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 7B or Grok 4.1 Fast better for coding?

Grok 4.1 Fast scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.1 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Grok 4.1 Fast share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 Fast has 32.