# Gemma 7B vs Granite 3.1 8b Instruct

> Granite 3.1 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-7b-vs-granite-3-1-8b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads 35.5 to 27.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 7B | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 32.4 |
| Rank | 299 | 258 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294)
- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 34.5 (#233)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | 1186 |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 7B: —
- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 24.1 (#120)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.1% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249)
- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 22.1 (#207)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 1145 |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228)
- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.0 (#209)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | 1152 |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252)
- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#220)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | 1142 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287)
- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.9 (#260)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 1099 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | 1145 |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | 1092 |
| LMArena French | 1025 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295)
- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.6 (#259)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 1131 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282)
- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#241)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | 1162 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302)
- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.5 (#266)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 1150 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1129 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | 1108 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 7B better than Granite 3.1 8b Instruct?

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 7B or Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better for coding?

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.5 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13.