# Gemma 7B vs GLM-5.3

> GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-7b-vs-glm-5-3
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5.3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5.3 leads 75.7 to 27.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 7B | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 54.8 |
| Rank | 299 | 26 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $1.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $4.40 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294)
- GLM-5.3: 59.5 (#14)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | 1496 |
| DeepSWE | — | 69% |
| FrontierCode | — | 40.1% |
| CursorBench | — | 42.6% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1622 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 30.2% |
| SciCode | — | 59% |
| WeirdML | — | 75.4% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,317 |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 7B: —
- GLM-5.3: 36.4 (#38)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 56.6% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 8,164 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249)
- GLM-5.3: 46.1 (#46)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 1489 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | 155.61 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.2% |
| CritPt | — | 19.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 33% |
| DTBench | — | 87.7% |
| LMCA | — | 55.5% |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| Bench to the Future 3 | — | 0.15 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228)
- GLM-5.3: 62.3 (#33)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | 1489 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 68.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 29.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 91.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 49% |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252)
- GLM-5.3: 58.3 (#37)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | 1516 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 90.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 41% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287)
- GLM-5.3: 55.7 (#28)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 1457 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | 1528 |
| LMArena French | 1025 | 1499 |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | 1463 |
| LMArena German | — | 1499 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1453 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1472 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1460 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295)
- GLM-5.3: 77.5 (#23)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 1477 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282)
- GLM-5.3: 45.4 (#41)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | 1482 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302)
- GLM-5.3: 75.7 (#6)

| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 1471 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1457 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | 1472 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2075 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 7B better than GLM-5.3?

GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 7B or GLM-5.3 better for coding?

GLM-5.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.5 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and GLM-5.3 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5.3 has 42.