# Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3 Max

> Gemma 4 31B IT and Qwen3 Max score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.2 vs 43.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-4-31b-it-vs-qwen3-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 24

## Summary

- They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen3 Max in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 Max leads 48.1 to 37.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 70.6% for Gemma 4 31B IT and 30.1% for Qwen3 Max.
- Gemma 4 31B IT is cheaper at $0.09 / $0.34 per million input/output tokens, against $1.20 / $6 for Qwen3 Max.
- Gemma 4 31B IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 4 31B IT | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.2 | 43.5 |
| Rank | 85 | 82 |
| Context | 262K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.09 | $1.20 |
| Output $/M | $0.34 | $6 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.9 (#98)
- Qwen3 Max: 42.4 (#93)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1459 | 1456 |
| ALE-Bench | 925.5 | 370.45 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1364 | — |
| SciCode | 43.4% | — |
| WeirdML | 52.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 4 31B IT: —
- Qwen3 Max: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 71.56 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 4 31B IT: 26.4 (#119)
- Qwen3 Max: 22.0 (#186)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 63.5% | 72.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 70.6% | 30.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1448 | 1448 |
| DTBench | 82.7% | 82.1% |
| LMCA | 39.3% | 28.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 142.74 | 142.41 |
| CritPt | 1.4% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 53% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 5% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 30.6% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.3 (#72)
- Qwen3 Max: 37.6 (#94)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 73.3% | 73.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1464 | 1447 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.9% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.1% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 4 31B IT: 37.9 (#141)
- Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#72)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 75.8% | 72.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 10.4% | 48.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1465 | 1457 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.4% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.0 (#32)
- Qwen3 Max: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1278 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1425 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 4 31B IT: 54.0 (#52)
- Qwen3 Max: 53.9 (#58)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1431 | 1429 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1478 | 1479 |
| LMArena French | 1436 | 1450 |
| LMArena Russian | 1462 | 1428 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1443 | 1463 |
| LMArena German | — | 1463 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1397 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 4 31B IT: 75.6 (#58)
- Qwen3 Max: 75.0 (#81)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1433 | 1420 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 4 31B IT: 44.2 (#67)
- Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#129)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1446 | 1439 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 14.5% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 4 31B IT: 60.7 (#92)
- Qwen3 Max: 62.6 (#72)

| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1443 | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1416 | 1401 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1452 | 1446 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1368 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1120 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 4 31B IT better than Qwen3 Max?

Gemma 4 31B IT and Qwen3 Max score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.2 vs 43.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 31B IT or Qwen3 Max?

Gemma 4 31B IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.09 per million input tokens and $0.34 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Max lists at $1.20 and $6.

### Is Gemma 4 31B IT or Qwen3 Max better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (41.9 vs 42.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 31B IT and Qwen3 Max share?

24 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 31B IT has 35 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.